Multi-Touch Patent

Update: Does anyone know precisely what it is that Apple has patented? The Apple Blog seems to suggest they were granted a sweeping, all-inclusive patent on anything multi-touch, but PC Magazine hints that it was somewhat more specific and has only really protected the pinch-and-zoom feature. Does anyone have a clarification on this?

The Apple Blog has an essay in defense of Apple’s recently approved multi-touch patent. As an inventor it would be nice to have multi-touch available without a license from Apple, but it was hard to argue with this paragraph:

“…[W]hy put in the massive amounts of time, money and effort to truly innovate — and put up with all your competitors mocking and ridiculing it until the product becomes a huge hit — only to watch them change their tune and just start ripping it off? The incentive is that if you take those huge risks (does anyone not appreciate what a risk this was for Apple?) you’ll get rewarded by being afforded some level of protection. That potential reward encourages innovation, it doesn’t kill it. In fact, it’s a major reason for the patent system in the first place.”

So remember, if you’re upset by the multi-touch patent, just go out there and invent something better. Thanks to the patent system, you’ll get your reward (even if you can’t have multi-touch on everything in sight).

  • http://www.zacharyspencer.com Zachary Spencer

    I personally believe that Apples Multi-Touch patent is a perfectly legitimate patent.

    It’s a patent on the technical implementation of multi-touch methodology. There are other ways to do multi-touch other than how Apple did. You can still do those things.

    HOWEVER there are extraneous patents as well, take for example Amazon’s “One Click Ordering” patent, where they patented *any* system, with any technical implementation for how to allow someone to order from your website with one click.

    This is an abuse of a somewhat broken patent system.

  • http://www.daspecster.com Tom Schultz

    I guess I would wonder why it’s under so much scrutiny if it’s legitimate? Here is the patent..
    http://patft.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect1=PTO2&Sect2=HITOFF&p=1&u=%2Fnetahtml%2FPTO%2Fsearch-bool.html&r=1&f=G&l=50&co1=AND&d=PTXT&s1=7,479,949&OS=7,479,949&RS=7,479,949

    I think Apple is taking it a little far with claims like this…

    “The computing device of claim 1, wherein, in one heuristic of the one or more heuristics, a contact comprising a finger swipe gesture that initially moves within a predetermined angle of being perfectly vertical with respect to the touch screen display corresponds to the one-dimensional vertical screen scrolling command.”

    Technology like this has been around for a long time and now Apple wants to own my finger movements? I think that’s a little ridiculous.

    Here’s another article about it
    http://i.gizmodo.com/5142445/dissecting-apples-multitouch-patent-can-it-stop-palm